The Brand Blog

Branding is a field in flux, reshaping itself and incorporating new ideas and disciplines every day. Please read along as I try to track the progress and join the conversation.

UW_biz_cardI've actually started to enjoy it when people ask me if I was associated with the "train wreck" University of Waterloo branding exercise. I was indeed associated with it as lead brand strategist, in partnership with Ove Design, working with the brilliant and courageous VP External Relations, Meg Beckel and a powerhouse team from across the University, and I am very proud to say so. Hardly a train wreck, the initiative has been transformational for Waterloo and has created a new level of self awareness and engagement that will have strategic impact long-term.

This was academic brand strategy done right: deep internal and external consultation, senior leadership engagement and patient process of discovery and negotiation. The core ideas were strong and supported.    

Unfortunately While Meg and her team prepared for a three month internal consultation on a new visual identity, a well-meaning student working on the program loved the logo so much they "borrowed" the file and posted it on their Facebook page. Ooops. Not the launch that Meg had foreseen. Within two weeks there were thousands of members on a FB page slagging the logo - a lot of cheap shots, heard 'round the world. Meg and the team went back into listening mode and have now launched a VI that has 90% of the original elements and strong internal support.

I asked Meg to reflect on the experience. Was it a train wreck? "Far from it." Meg claims. "I like to call it logo-gate because in the same way that Watergate increased public awareness for the need for political transparency and accountability, logo-gate accelerated our collective understanding of our mission, our brand and our character as an institution. The urgency of the dialogue allowed us to achieve in six months what other universities might need a decade to process."

Meg is adamant that the experience was a net positive for Waterloo. Vital internal priorities around student life are being addressed, the University has a new external voice with which to attract students, faculty, staff and donors, and there is a heightened sensitivity to the value of engagement - especially by Waterloo students who have never been known for being the most activated lot. This year's big message - Ideas Start Here - arose from a strong internal sentiment that we're about what's new, but "innovative" just doesn't capture it.

All-in-all a great, if at times stressful experience.

What would we have done differently? Perhaps we would not have taken no for an answer when we invited the entire student community to engage and only 11 obliged. As she reflects on it Meg observes that she might have stood her ground a bit harder on the logo. It was was a great design with real integrity.

What would we do the same next time? Always let the brand come from inside the organization, listen, negotiate and be bold with ideas. Stretch the conservative instincts of faculty and staff, and know which battles are most important to take on. These are the things that make branding work in the unique environment of a university. This is no place for glib packaging, consumer brand-speak, marketing fluff or for imposed ideas. This is where brand takes on its most rigorous and authentic form.

And we will never forget the symbolic power of a logo and the passionate force with which people will respond to change in visual identity. At Waterloo it became an unprecedented catalyst for engagement.

Again, I could not be more proud to have been part of a process that has honed Canada's most powerful academic brand; to have worked with Meg and her amazing team, and to have been inspired by the vision of President David Johnston, who now turns to putting his remarkable energy to his role as the next Governor General of Canada.  

Not exactly a train-wreck.  

grayboxI'm annoyed by what I see as the black box at the centre of most large-scale corporate brand strategy initiatives. Especially when there are outside advisors involved there always seems to be a dark cloak of mystery over the key points at which the brand idea is developed. Yes, there is interviewing, and reputation surveys and sometimes workshops and the dreaded "validation research" but are these really proxies for true involvement? Can they begin to tap the deep organizational wisdom that exists around competitive position, values and brand opportunity? Can they begin to set the stage for a brand that helps the organization focus on key business-bulilding priorities? Not in my view. We need to move brand strategy out of the wizardry of brand consultancy and into the belly of the organization where it belongs.

happy-faceHow strong is your corporate brand? Important question. How can you do better than guess at the answer? Well, you could spend six or seven figures on some quant research on reputation (which will do little more than confirm your gut about what people think of you), you can invest in a brand valuation (which will give you a nice round number that isn’t reliable and won’t tell you much about how well your business is performing) or you can put a PR resource on retainer to track the interweb for mentions, sentiment and buzz. Or there is Net Promoter Score, and no doubt myriad other ways to extract your dollars and distract you from what matters.  Even after all this expenditure of time and money, I don’t believe you’ll be any better informed than you are now.

But wait, there’s hope.

Allen Hirsh had a very good idea. Build a practice around helping organizations form the next generation of leadership: www.nextgenleaders.ca

Then he had an even better idea: build a network of thinkers, practitioners and collaborators that would work together on exploring the issues and advising decision makers: www.nextgenleaders.ca/our-network/overview.html

I was fortunate enough to be asked to join this network and I feel privileged to be signed on with such and accomplished and generous group.

mission_visionI'm often asked as part of brand strategies to help with vision and mission statements and values definition. What is it with these things? Every organization seems to want them, but they put the most flimsy thought into them (despite spending hours on successive re-drafts that turn them into deadened sludge). They are usually derided by employees as meaningless fluff and only ever see the light of day on lunchroom posters, bad PowerPoint slides and desktop SWAG.

You know what I mean: "Our vision is to be the leader (or the provider of choice) in the provision of fully integrated solutions that meet customer needs and generate shareholder value. Our mission is to continuously improve our effectiveness and efficiency through teamwork....bla bla bla...

I’ve always thought that the question was not “how is my brand doing”? It’s “how is my company doing”? Nice to have a top-10 rated brand by Interbrand, Millward Brown or Brand Finance, but if your stock is sinking, which it might well be, who cares about a brand value ranking?

My colleague and friend Jonathan Knowles, founder of Type 2 Consulting and probably our most cogent thinker on brand and marketing valuation, has been sharing with me some of his own, and others’ research on the link between good brand management and the creation of shareholder value. This is not the same as how-does-your-brand-do-in-the-rankings question (which is good for the ego, but not necessarily the shareholder). This is: what is the real value that your brand is creating, from a financial performance point-of-view. Powerful stuff for marketers who need to speak the language of the CFO and very compelling for CEOs working to bring their boards and executive teams onside with investment in brand – when other needs are competing for dollars.

All Things DesignWe made the rounds at London Design Week this year, hoping to see forward into what’s next in design and branding. We weren’t disappointed, but sometimes maybe a bit confused. The festival itself is spread out across London, which gives it a very nice feeling of being a treasure hunt, but it is actually pretty hard to navigate, despite have a lot of talent roaming around who understand wayfinding, visualization and signage. Work on that, okay guys?

The Business of Design series had some great sessions on things like creative cities, the future of brands and  sustainable architecture. We particularly liked Tyler Brule’s session on brands with Martin Raymond, Co-director – Future Laboratory and Marek Reichman – Head of Design at Aston Martin. There was some good, honest discussion about authenticity in brands and the importance of protecting credibility (gee, do I have to?). We loved the tough talk about market research. The consensus seemed to be that while it is good to know all about your customers, it is not good to ask them if they like your new ideas. Market research kills new ideas. I could not agree more and have been advising my clients to pass on the testing. Do the right work up front, and you don’t need the stink testing later.

 

Okay, so no one can totally recession-proof anything, but I’ve been thinking about some simple things you can do with and for your brand during down markets, when the temptation is to cut costs, slash prices, eliminate staff, lower service levels, change who you are and very possibly alienate customers (so that when the economy turns around – which it will- they’ll have moved on). I’ve been thinking about five opportunities:

Recessionary hot dogs

1. Stay true to your value proposition but adapt to new realities. Anticipate how your customers are going to change their behaviour, and change with them. This is particularly important if you are in a category that is the first to get chopped when consumers feel queasy. Coffee drinkers might be skimping on their $4 daily latte, but they might also be interested in buying more beans and coffee-making accessories to roast, grind and brew at home. Large scale computer purchases may be down but service contracts, leasing and targeted productivity tools might be up. Professional services clients may not be planning the big projects but will thank you for bringing them ideas that will improve their performance for minimal investment. There are examples like this in just about every category. The idea is to shift your offer, while staying true to what your brand means to your customer. Keep delivering on your promise, just adjust the scale.

 

icecreamWho cannot place their hand on their heart and say that what consumers really want is authenticity? I can’t.

With sincerest apologies to the burgeoning authenticity industry, as documented in Gilmore and Pine’s What Consumers Really Want: Authenticity (and just about every bibliographic reference in it), what is mistaken as an appetite for authenticity is actually a desire for escape, denial, disguise, control and temporary or permanent identity shift. How can Gilmore, Pine and others claim that consumers want authenticity when even they agree that our world gets less real every day? Harley Davidson? HÃagen-Dazs? Las Vegas? Plastic surgery? Reality television? Reality television about plastic surgery? Low calorie brownies? Designer knock-offs? Spas? Wrestling? PT Cruisers?

Maybe you can twist all this into some theory about real-fake, fake-fake and fake-real offerings (as Gilmore and Pike attempt), but the fact is, there is no mass market for the truly authentic in any category. Travel, food, clothing, health, entertainment, recreation, consumer goods, personal services, luxury and so on. There is craft, the quaint, home-made and farm stands, but not much else.

chickens and roostersWhen it comes to competitive brand strategy you can be right in a lot of ways, but you can be really, really wrong in just two: 1) believing that there is no one out there like you and so you own your category and have no direct competition or 2) that you operate in a commoditized category and you'll never be able to truly differentiate, so why bother. I hear both all the time – and shockingly – sometimes from within the same organization.

Regarding the former, no matter how unique, one-of-a-kind, quirky or pioneering you are, there is always something else that your customers can do with their money, their time and their affection. There are pure plays that eat away at your offer, giants for whom what you do is a rounding error and lots of competitors who will say they do what you do, but don't. Heads up. Someone is eating your lunch; I guarantee it.

 

ikonica coverFrom Peter C. Newman going on about power games to Naomi Klein dissing brands altogether to Andrea Mandel-Campbell telling us why Mexicans don’t drink Molson beer, we just have not had a lot of optimistic discourse on Canadian brands in the last 40 years. Jeannette Hanna’s and Alan Middleton’s new book Ikonica has changed that. In short, Hanna/Middleton show that brands=values and that Canadian values=good brands and that Canadian companies can win globally on the basis of our own particular brand genius.

Full disclosure: Jeannette is a long-time collaborator of mine, and my sister-in-law, and I was very lucky to have been able to watch and cheer from the sidelines as the ideas in Ikonica took shape. The end product – which I hope is really just the beginning of a national discourse – is a treasure.

The book – structured as a field guide, beautifully designed by Paul Hodgson and written to be read with pleasure – opens by putting Canadian brands into their historical and cultural context. The authors propose an 11-point model of what makes Canadian brands Canadian. I love this part. Communitarian, chameleon-like, sceptical, collaborative….for example. When I think of the great Canadian brands I’ve worked with, these attributes are not just accurate, they are at the heart of what has made them successful.

 

I am fascinated by the presence of intense contradictions in organizations. It may be possible that the highest performing, most innovative organizations are the ones that can manage the greatest degree of internal paradox, and not spin out of control, or lose their centre.

In HBR’s current “The Contradictions That Drive Toyota’s Success,” for example, the authors observe that it is intense contradiction that fuels the success of the dogged innovator, the cost manager that places big bets, the frugal splurger, the hierarchical meritocracy. These ideas are very Japanese, and I have always thought that Japanese life and culture is made more interesting by its many simultaneous opposites: ancient and post-modern, tacky and stylish, faddish and timeless, loud and silent, totally over-stimulated and completely Zen.

© MJ Braide Corporate Development 2010