<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The truth about difference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mjbraide.com/mjblog/the-truth-about-difference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mjbraide.com/mjblog/the-truth-about-difference/</link>
	<description>What's on my mind...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Phipps</title>
		<link>http://mjbraide.com/mjblog/the-truth-about-difference/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Phipps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mjbraide.com/mjblog/the-truth-about-difference/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>One might even add a third dimension to the differentiation process: a brand's ability to differentiate its customers from the customers of other brands. In theory, superior brands produce superior customers; a brand strategy will be geared to create customers that are distinctively advantaged. That's part of the brand proposition. Companies that treat their customers as commodities--purely to be sold to--will never reach their brand potential. Ted Levitt might say they suffer from "brand myopia." Their brands are destined to be differentiated in the shallowest measures: positioning, messaging and campaigns. One can see this today in how the Apple brand seems to be taking its customers to a higher level of digital experience, while competing PC brands treat their customers as if it's still the 1990's. The result: booming sales for the Apple brand, and a commodity swim for the rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One might even add a third dimension to the differentiation process: a brand&#8217;s ability to differentiate its customers from the customers of other brands. In theory, superior brands produce superior customers; a brand strategy will be geared to create customers that are distinctively advantaged. That&#8217;s part of the brand proposition. Companies that treat their customers as commodities&#8211;purely to be sold to&#8211;will never reach their brand potential. Ted Levitt might say they suffer from &#8220;brand myopia.&#8221; Their brands are destined to be differentiated in the shallowest measures: positioning, messaging and campaigns. One can see this today in how the Apple brand seems to be taking its customers to a higher level of digital experience, while competing PC brands treat their customers as if it&#8217;s still the 1990&#8217;s. The result: booming sales for the Apple brand, and a commodity swim for the rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
